Showing posts with label Free Trade Agreement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Free Trade Agreement. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

India As The Fourth Largest Economy: An Analytical Perspective



Abstract

Over the past year, there has been intense debate in academic, policy, and media circles regarding whether India has officially become the world’s fourth-largest economy. While several reports, videos, and unofficial estimates suggested that India had overtaken Japan, an official confirmation from the Government of India was awaited. This confirmation came just before the New Year through a press release issued by the Press Information Bureau (PIB), stating that India has indeed surpassed Japan to become the fourth-largest economy in the world in nominal GDP terms. This article provides an overall analytical perspective on this development, explains what being the “fourth largest economy” actually means, examines the drivers behind India’s economic rise, compares India with Japan and Germany, and critically evaluates the gap between aggregate GDP and per capita income.

Introduction

India’s ascent in global economic rankings marks a significant milestone in its development trajectory. According to the Government of India, India’s nominal GDP has reached approximately USD 4.187 trillion, marginally surpassing Japan. Alongside this announcement, the government has projected that India may overtake Germany within the next three years, potentially becoming the third-largest economy by the end of the decade. However, headline rankings often conceal important structural realities. Therefore, it is essential to analyze this achievement from a broader economic perspective.

Understanding the Concept of the Fourth Largest Economy

The claim that India is the fourth-largest economy is based on nominal GDP, measured at current prices and converted into US dollars using prevailing exchange rates. Nominal GDP reflects the total monetary value of goods and services produced within a country over a year. It captures the overall size of economic output but does not account for population size or income distribution.

As per recent estimates: – United States: ~USD 28 trillion – China: ~USD 18 trillion – Germany: ~USD 4.5 trillion – India: ~USD 4.1–4.2 trillion – Japan: ~USD 4.168Slightly below India

This ranking reflects aggregate economic output rather than individual prosperity, a distinction that becomes crucial when comparing per capita income levels.

India’s “Goldilocks” Phase of Growth

In its PIB release, the Government of India described the current phase of growth as a Goldilocks moment—a situation where economic growth is strong while inflation remains relatively moderate. Typically, high growth is accompanied by high inflation, but India currently exhibits a favorable balance. Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation has remained under control even as GDP growth has accelerated, creating conducive conditions for sustained expansion.

How Did India Overtake Japan?

Several structural and cyclical factors explain why India has surpassed Japan in nominal GDP terms.

1. Growth Trajectories

Japan is a mature, developed economy with limited growth potential. Over the past three decades, its average growth rate has hovered around 1% or less. In contrast, India, as a developing economy with a large and youthful population, has consistently recorded real growth rates between 6% and 7%.

2. Demographic Differences

Japan faces rapid population ageing, leading to a shrinking workforce and lower productivity growth. India, on the other hand, enjoys a demographic advantage with a median age of around 28 years, supporting both consumption and production.

3. Currency Effects

Nominal GDP comparisons are sensitive to exchange rate movements. While the Indian rupee has depreciated in recent years, the Japanese yen has weakened even more significantly. Since GDP is measured in US dollar terms, currency depreciation directly reduces nominal GDP rankings.

4. Structural Momentum

India is witnessing strong momentum in manufacturing expansion, infrastructure development, and the digital economy. Japan, by contrast, has faced prolonged deflationary pressures and relatively stagnant domestic demand.

Key Drivers of India’s Economic Rise

India’s economic expansion is supported by multiple reinforcing drivers:

Demographic Advantage

A large working-age population fuels consumption, savings, and investment, making demographics one of India’s strongest growth engines.

Infrastructure Push

Massive public investment in highways, railways, airports, ports, logistics parks, and urban infrastructure has reduced logistics costs and improved competitiveness across sectors such as cement, steel, and manufacturing.

Manufacturing and Industrial Policy

Government initiatives such as the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes across electronics, defence, pharmaceuticals, and other sectors have boosted domestic manufacturing. Additionally, the global “China+1” strategy has redirected foreign investment towards India.

Strong Domestic Demand

India’s GDP composition reveals that consumption contributes nearly 55–60% of total output. A growing middle class has driven demand in housing, automobiles, services, and consumer goods, insulating the economy from global shocks.

Digital Public Infrastructure

The expansion of Aadhaar, UPI, and the GST network has lowered transaction costs, enhanced formalisation, and improved efficiency across the economy.

Why Germany Is Likely to Be Next

Germany currently ranks as the world’s third-largest economy, with a nominal GDP exceeding USD 4.5 trillion. However, India is projected to overtake Germany within the next three years due to differential growth rates. India has been growing at an annual rate of approximately 6.5–7.7%, with recent quarterly growth figures reaching 7.4%, 7.8%, and 8.2%. Germany, in contrast, has struggled to grow beyond 1–2% annually.

Moreover, Germany is heavily export-dependent and vulnerable to global trade slowdowns, energy transition costs, and an ageing population. India’s growth model, driven largely by domestic consumption, provides greater resilience.

Additionally, India’s GDP base year is expected to shift from 2011–12 to 2022–23, which may further raise measured GDP levels, potentially accelerating the overtaking of Germany.

Aggregate GDP vs Per Capita Income: The Core Challenge

Despite India’s impressive aggregate GDP ranking, per capita income remains relatively low due to its large population. With a population of approximately 1.43 billion, India’s per capita GDP is around USD 2,800.

In contrast, Japan (population ~123 million) has a per capita GDP of around USD 34,000. – Germany’s per capita income is similarly high.

This implies that the average Japanese citizen earns nearly 12 times more than the average Indian. Thus, while India’s economic size has expanded, individual prosperity has not yet reached comparable levels.

Implications for Policy and Global Standing

Becoming the fourth-largest economy enhances India’s global standing. It strengthens India’s role in global supply chains, increases its attractiveness for foreign direct investment, and enhances its influence in multilateral institutions such as the IMF, World Bank, and G20.

Geopolitically, India is increasingly viewed as a balancing power between the United States and China, gaining leverage in trade negotiations, climate diplomacy, and technology governance.

However, the ultimate success of economic growth depends on its translation into employment generation, higher productivity, improved education, better healthcare, and rising living standards.

Conclusion

India’s emergence as the world’s fourth-largest economy is a significant symbolic and structural milestone. Official confirmation by the Government of India underscores the country’s strong growth momentum and favorable macroeconomic conditions. Nevertheless, this achievement should be interpreted with caution. High aggregate GDP does not automatically imply widespread prosperity. The central challenge ahead lies in converting economic growth into inclusive development, higher per capita incomes, and improved human development outcomes. Only then will India’s rise in global rankings reflect genuine progress for its citizens.

About the Author:

Dr. Nitish Kumar Arya

Dr. Nitish Kumar Arya is an Assistant Professor of Economics in the University Economics Department, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura, Bihar, India. He is working in Public Economics and Public policy with a special focus on contemporary economic issues.

Saturday, January 10, 2026

India–New Zealand Free Trade Agreement: A Strategic Masterstroke In India’s Trade Diplomacy

India–New Zealand Free Trade Agreement: A Strategic Masterstroke in India’s Trade Diplomacy


In 2025, India took a decisive leap in reshaping its global trade architecture by signing its third Free Trade Agreement (FTA) of the year, this time with New Zealand. Following earlier FTAs with the United Kingdom and Oman, the India–New Zealand agreement marks another milestone in India’s evolving trade diplomacy and reflects its broader strategy of export expansion, market diversification, and protection of sensitive domestic sectors.

A Shift in India’s Trade Strategy: Historical Context

Over the past five years, India has signed seven FTAs, signaling a renewed push towards trade liberalisation after a long phase of cautious engagement. Before the onset of U.S. protectionist policies under former President Donald Trump, India had signed only four FTAs in four years. However, the global trade disruptions triggered by the U.S.–China trade war compelled India to reduce its overdependence on the United States and actively seek alternative markets.

This strategic shift has accelerated India’s engagement with multiple regions, including Europe, the Middle East, and the Pacific, with the New Zealand FTA emerging as one of the most advantageous deals negotiated so far.

Key Features of the India–New Zealand FTA

The India–New Zealand FTA has drawn attention internationally, particularly because of its asymmetric benefits in India’s favour, a point strongly criticised by New Zealand’s opposition parties.

One of the most significant provisions of the agreement is India’s decision to eliminate tariffs on nearly 95% of New Zealand’s export items, granting New Zealand extensive access to India’s vast consumer market. At the same time, India has strategically safeguarded its dairy sector, refusing to open domestic markets to New Zealand’s dairy products such as milk, butter, cheese, curd, and yogurt.

This protection is crucial for India, where the dairy sector supports millions of small and marginal farmers. Opening the sector to cheaper and highly competitive dairy imports from New Zealand could have destabilised rural livelihoods. Consequently, while the agreement expands trade, it also reflects India’s firm stance on protecting sensitive sectors.

The deal has also incorporated enhanced immigration and mobility provisions, enabling New Zealand to recruit skilled Indian professionals more easily. This aligns with India’s growing role as a global supplier of skilled labour, particularly in technology and services.

Economic Impact and Investment Prospects

Currently, bilateral trade between India and New Zealand stands at approximately $2.4 billion. With the implementation of the FTA, trade volumes are expected to rise sharply to $5–7 billion in the coming years. Moreover, the agreement includes a long-term investment commitment of $20 billion over the next 15 years, indicating deepening economic engagement beyond trade in goods alone.

Broader Implications for India’s Global Trade Policy

India’s sequential signing of FTAs with countries such as the UK, Oman, and now New Zealand has broader geopolitical and economic implications. Collectively, these agreements increase diplomatic and economic pressure on the United States to reconsider its trade engagement with India.

At the same time, India’s approach highlights a balanced trade philosophy—liberalising non-sensitive sectors while shielding critical domestic industries like agriculture and dairy. This model may shape future negotiations, including potential FTAs with the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), comprising Russia, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan.

Conclusion

The India–New Zealand Free Trade Agreement represents a strategic win for India’s trade diplomacy. By securing expanded market access, protecting domestic farmers, encouraging skilled migration, and unlocking long-term investments, India has demonstrated a nuanced and assertive approach to global trade negotiations.

As global trade dynamics continue to shift in the post-protectionism era, India’s growing network of FTAs underscores its ambition to emerge as a diversified, resilient, and influential trading power in the global economy.

India–New Zealand Free Trade Agreement: A Strategic Masterstroke in India’s Trade Diplomacy

About the author:

Dr. Nitish Kumar Arya

Dr. Nitish Kumar Arya is an Assistant Professor of Economics in the University Economics Department, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura, Bihar, India. He works in Public Economics and Public policy, with a special focus on contemporary economic issues.